IJ has it's own kotlin libs, as well as fleet. So, let's use kotlin reflection library only to compile the project without bundling these jars into the resulting plugin
.name will show the correct name "IdeaVim" in IJ
`misc.xml` contains information about the annotations that should be considered as "EntryPoints" for the function. With this, they'll not be marked as unused
Explicit API mode has been removed due to several reasons impacting developer productivity and the natural coding style in Kotlin.
Firstly, the mode was found to be more irritating than beneficial, as it forced unnecessary verbosity without enhancing thoughtfulness in coding. It often prompted automatic 'public' insertion reactions to red-highlighted code, which did not genuinely encourage more deliberate coding decisions.
Secondly, our aim is to form a robust API primarily through interfaces, which inherently define public scope and duty, rendering explicit API mode somewhat redundant.
Lastly, the additional verbosity caused by explicit API mode expanded code lines affecting code readability.
The compatibility with the existing plugins is verified via the compatibility checker, so no JetBrains plugins will be affected
As this is considered as a VERY bad practice, it makes sense in this particular case. Generally, we need an updated release process so such things don’t happen
There are a lot of incompatibilities with IdeaVim on 241 if it's built on 233
Also, this time the special branch for the IJ version won't be created. Previously on bumping the version of IJ, we've created the branch to keep the reference to the moment when it happened. However, IJ version bumps are easy to trace anyway by git.
We should calculate the line above based on logical position rather than visual position.
This issue was detected thanks to newly introduced soft wraps and proprty tests
There is no need to clean up the requiredShortcuts after turning off the plugin. Also, previously this set was not populated properly and keys that were added by ideavimrc or by user were not restored
EditorDataContext cannot be used because the platform cannot convert it to the async data context. Taking the fact that it's not clear why this custom context exists, I decided to get rid of it at all.
```
Cannot convert to AsyncDataContext at 'keyboard shortcut' DataContextWrapper(CaretSpecificDataContext(com.maddyhome.idea.vim.helper.EditorDataContext)). Please use CustomizedDataContext or its inheritors like SimpleDataContext
```
Class EditorDataContext cannot be removed because it's used in github.zgqq.intellij-enhance plugin
EditorDataContext cannot be used because the platform cannot convert it to the async data context. Taking the fact that it's not clear why this custom context exists, I decided to get rid of it at all.
```
Cannot convert to AsyncDataContext at 'keyboard shortcut' DataContextWrapper(CaretSpecificDataContext(com.maddyhome.idea.vim.helper.EditorDataContext)). Please use CustomizedDataContext or its inheritors like SimpleDataContext
```
EditorDataContext cannot be used because the platform cannot convert it to the async data context. Taking the fact that it's not clear why this custom context exists, I decided to get rid of it at all.
```
Cannot convert to AsyncDataContext at 'keyboard shortcut' DataContextWrapper(CaretSpecificDataContext(com.maddyhome.idea.vim.helper.EditorDataContext)). Please use CustomizedDataContext or its inheritors like SimpleDataContext
```
This is a part of VIM-3376. This context will not be a custom EditorDataContext, but some context created by the platform.
In some places we don't have any kind of "current context", but we have to use it for the function. However, such context can be simply retrieved from the editor.
This one was added after the implementation of cmap in 5c9faba7f4
EditorDataContext cannot be used because the platform cannot convert it to the async data context. Taking the fact that it's not clear why this custom context exists, I decided to get rid of it at all.
```
Cannot convert to AsyncDataContext at 'keyboard shortcut' DataContextWrapper(CaretSpecificDataContext(com.maddyhome.idea.vim.helper.EditorDataContext)). Please use CustomizedDataContext or its inheritors like SimpleDataContext
```
EditorDataContext cannot be used because the platform cannot convert it to the async data context. Taking the fact that it's not clear why this custom context exists, I decided to get rid of it at all.
```
Cannot convert to AsyncDataContext at 'keyboard shortcut' DataContextWrapper(CaretSpecificDataContext(com.maddyhome.idea.vim.helper.EditorDataContext)). Please use CustomizedDataContext or its inheritors like SimpleDataContext
```
This context was added long ago, but I wasn't able to find specific reasons for that. Currently, such custom contexts cannot work with the intellij platform and should be refactored or removed. The issues with this context are that it cannot be converted to the async data context by the platform.
Taking the fact that the reason for this context was not found, I decided to get rid of it.
The issue from the platform looks like this
```
Cannot convert to AsyncDataContext at 'keyboard shortcut' DataContextWrapper(CaretSpecificDataContext(com.maddyhome.idea.vim.helper.EditorDataContext)). Please use CustomizedDataContext or its inheritors like SimpleDataContext
```
Here the EditorDataContext is mentioned instead of CaretAndEditorData context, however, I'll clean up both contexts during this refactoring
It was used in the action system for mapping to the `<Action>` keyword and in commit 256f5fcd0e it's mentioned that the EditorActionHandler was not working without this context. However, currently both cases work fine without addition wrapping.
Alex Plate