The QNAM may continue to outlive both.
Rename Credentials::getQNAM() to createQNAM() while we're at it - it's
used to make a new QNAM that will subsequently be owned by the Account
object.
See d01065b9a1 for rationale.
Relates to
d40c56eda5147cf798a6
This is useful for monitoring what kind of network requests are
sent to the fake server. Such as "did this sync cause an upload?"
and "was there a propfind for this path?". It can also inject
custom replies.
The client is very picky about date strings it accepts. If dates are
formatted with a non-C locale (such as localized weekday names), it
fails to parse it and tests fail in subtle ways.
* For requests:
- reuse the original QNetworkRequest, so headers and attributes
are the same as in the original request
- determine the original http method from the reply and the request
attributes
- keep the original request body around such that it can be sent
again in case the request is redirected
* Simplify the interface that is used for creating new requests in
AbstractNetworkJob.
- Put all tests in the bin directory so that DLLs can be loaded
- Add missing exports
- Skip tests that use code depending on zlib
- The "GMT" timezone is named differently, use the int constructor instead
5 tests are still failing, it's not really worth fixing at the moment
since no developper is currently using Windows as its main platform.
This was to catch duplicate emissions for PropagateDirectory but we
don't emit this signal anymore from there.
This fixes a warning about PropagatorJob not being a registered metatype.
This reverts commit fe42c1a818.
Stale chunks might be there because a file was removed or would just not
be uploaded, for any reason.
We just start the DeleteJob but we don't care if it success or not.
Relates to https://github.com/owncloud/core/issues/26981
One of the test is testing the case where the file is modified on the server
during the upload. So this test the precondition failed error.
The FakeGetReply logic was modified because resizing a 150MB big QByteArray
by increment of 16k just did not scale when downloading a big file.
Relates to https://github.com/owncloud/core/issues/26981
We do not track the success or error of the DeleteJob because it does not
matter. If it fails, it might be because the chunks were already removed.
If not, the chunks will be stale, but the server must anyway do a few
cleanup from time to time because we do not always remove the chunks
Previously this wasn't happening for errors that were not
NormalErrors because they don't end up in the blacklist.
This revises the resetting logic to be independent of the
error blacklist and make use of UploadInfo::errorCount
instead.
412 errors should reset chunked uploads because they might be
indicative of a checksum error.
Additionally, server bugs might require that additional
errors cause an upload reset. To allow that, a new capability
is added that can be used to advise the client about this.
We are going to change the webdav path depending on the capabilities.
But the SyncEngine and csync might have been created before the capabilities
are retrieved.
The main raison why we gave the path to the sync engine was to pass it to csync.
But the thing is that csync don't need anymore this url as everything is done by the
discovery classes in libsync that use the network jobs that use the account for the urls.
So csync do not need the remote URI.
shortenFilename in folderstatusmodel.cpp was useless because the string is the
_file of a SyncFileItem which is the relative file name, that name never
starts with owncloud://.
All the csync test creates the folder because csync use to check if the folder
exists. But we don't need to do that anymore
The "S" in the permission is only for the "Shared with me" files.
It is only used to show the shared status in the overlay icons.
But we also wish to show the shared status for files that are shared
"by" the users. We can find that out using the 'share-types' webdav
property. If set, then we are sharing the object.
We fake a 'S' in the permission as for our purpose, they mean the same.
Issue #4788
As the file can be some hunreds of megabytes, allocating such big arrays may
cause problems.
Also make the timeout a bit bigger so the test can rununder valgrind.
Issue #5224
Two problems:
- In the discovery phase, we need to check the selective sync entries of
the source path in case of renames.
- When the rename is done, we need to actually update the black list in the
database.
Two bugs:
- The change filed are not considered as move, they are re-downloaded
but the old file was not removed from the database. The change in
owncloudpropagator.cpp takes care of removing the old entries.
- Next sync would then remove the file in the server in the old folder
This was not a problem until we start reusing the sync engine, and
that the _renamedFolders map is not cleared. We were before deleting
a non-existing file. But now we delete the actual file.
Also improve the tests to be able to do move on the server.
This include support for file id.
Issue #5192
To be able to test the SyncEngine efficiently, a set of server
mocking classes have been implemented on top of QNetworkAccessManager.
The local disk side hasn't been mocked since this would require adding
a large abstraction layer in csync. The SyncEngine is instead pointed
to a different temporary dir in each test and we test by interacting
with files in this directory instead.
The FakeFolder object wraps the SyncEngine with those abstractions
and allow controlling the local files, and the fake remote state
through the FileModifier interface, using a FileInfo tree structure
for the remote-side implementation as well as feeding and comparing
the states on both side in tests.
Tests run fast and require no setup to be run, but each server feature
that we want to test on the client side needs to be implemented in
this fake objects library. For example, the OC-FileId header isn't
set as of this commit, and we can't test the file move logic properly
without implementing it first.
The TestSyncFileStatusTracker tests already contain a few QEXPECT_FAIL
for what I esteem being issues that need to be fixed in order to catch
up on our test coverage without making this patch too huge.
