Delete scripts that have been migrated to TypeScript or are unused:
- youtrackAnalysis/SelectTicketForAnalysis.kt (TS version used)
- youtrackAnalysis/CompleteTicketAnalysis.kt (TS version used)
- youtrackToolkit.kt (not imported anywhere)
- Related Gradle tasks
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Delete unused integration test infrastructure:
- .github/workflows/integrationsTest.yml
- scripts/src/main/kotlin/scripts/integrationsTest.kt
- Gradle task from build.gradle.kts
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Move the script from Kotlin (scripts/) to TypeScript (scripts-ts/)
for consistency with other YouTrack automation scripts.
Changes:
- Add setStatus() function to youtrack.ts
- Create updateYoutrackOnCommit.ts with git log parsing
- Update GitHub workflow to use Node.js instead of JDK/Gradle
- Remove Kotlin implementation and changelogUtils.kt
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reorganize scripts-ts/src structure by separating entry points (jobs)
from utility modules. The youtrack.ts module is now in tools/ subfolder.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Added description parameter to @TestWithoutNeovim annotations in
option mapper test classes to clarify why these tests are excluded
from Neovim verification. These tests verify integration between
IdeaVim options and IntelliJ's EditorSettingsExternalizable, which
is IDE-specific behavior not present in Neovim.
Modified files:
- ScrollOffOptionMapperTest
- SideScrollOffOptionMapperTest
- SideScrollOptionMapperTest
- ScrollJumpOptionMapperTest
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The context7 plugin tools need to be explicitly listed in claude_args
allowed-tools for Claude to use them without permission prompts.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Added a reminder about the available context7 MCP plugin to all Claude
prompts that have it enabled (triage, planning, bug-fix, feature-impl).
This helps Claude know it can look up Vim documentation when needed.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Introduces a planning phase between triage and implementation that:
- Explores the codebase to understand what needs to be implemented
- Creates a detailed implementation plan for bug fixes/features
- Asks for clarification when genuinely ambiguous (posts YouTrack comment)
Smart ticket selection with automatic answer detection:
- Prioritizes tickets with pending clarifications
- Uses AI to check if owner has answered questions
- Automatically removes pending tag when answered
- Falls back to random selection if no pending answers
Key changes:
- youtrack.ts: Add pending clarification tag constant and removeTag()
- selectTicketForAnalysis.ts: Query pending tickets first, add state fields
- completeTicketAnalysis.ts: Skip tagging for needs_clarification/no_answer
- Workflow: Add Step 0 (check answers) and Step 2 (planning)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Age is NEVER a reason to mark a ticket as outdated. Many 10-15+ year
old tickets are still valid. A ticket is outdated only when it has
BOTH vague/environment-specific description AND references to
features/APIs that no longer exist.
Parse the execution_file JSON to find permission_denials array
and automatically report them as attention_reason, even if Claude
doesn't self-report them. This ensures we catch tool permission
issues even when Claude works around them.
- All Claude steps now only update analysis_state.json (no text flags)
- All parse steps read from analysis_state.json using jq
- Added triage_attention_reason and changelog object to JSON structure
- Simpler and more consistent data flow
- attention_reason is now a separate flag that doesn't replace main status
- Workflow continues with main task even when issues are encountered
- Issues are reported alongside the main result (bug/feature/success/etc)
- Workflow fails at the end if any attention_reason was set
This will help understand:
- What outputs claude-code-action provides
- What the execution_file contains
- Whether the TRIAGE_RESULT pattern can be found
The claude-code-action does not have a 'response' output. Instead, it
provides 'execution_file' which is a path to the execution output file.
Changes:
- All parse steps now read from execution_file instead of response
- Added explicit git subcommand patterns to review and PR steps
- Added gh pr pattern for PR creation step
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add explicit patterns for git branch, git log, git blame, git diff,
and git show to ensure these commands are allowed during implementation.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Added attention_required mechanism to Step 1 (Triage)
- Added Bash(cat:*) to allowed tools for triage step
- Updated parse-triage to extract attention_reason
- Updated workflow summary to show triage attention reasons
- Updated fail condition to include triage attention_required
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Split the single monolithic Claude prompt (~200 lines) into 5 focused
steps to improve quality and debuggability:
1. Triage: Determines ticket type (bug/feature) and suitability
2. Bug Fix: TDD-based implementation with root cause analysis
3. Feature: Feature implementation with tests
4. Code Review: Uses code-reviewer subagent
5. Changelog & PR: Creates branch, commits, and PR
Key changes:
- Add analysis_state.json for state passing between steps
- Each step has focused prompt with single responsibility
- Conditional execution based on triage result (bug vs feature)
- Preserved attention_required mechanism for all impl steps
- Updated TypeScript scripts to read/write JSON state file
Benefits:
- Focused prompts reduce confusion
- Better debugging (see where pipeline fails)
- Early termination for unsuitable tickets
- Consistent code review (always happens)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This helps with debugging workflow runs by preserving the full
execution log in the workflow artifacts.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add WebFetch permissions for:
- github.com and raw.githubusercontent.com (commits, PRs, raw files)
- vimhelp.org and vimdoc.sourceforge.net (Vim documentation)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Emphasize that Claude should:
- Focus on bug descriptions, not user-suggested solutions which may be
inaccurate or too narrow for IdeaVim's architecture
- Find the actual root cause rather than implementing potentially flawed fixes
- Handle tickets with multiple issues by implementing them in separate commits
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Instruct Claude to be direct and avoid filler words, extra explanations,
or compliments. Focus on actionable feedback only.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
New Claude skill for routine test maintenance focusing on:
- Test quality and readability (meaningful content, clear names)
- Reviewing @Disabled tests to check if they can be re-enabled
- Ensuring @TestWithoutNeovim annotations have clear reasons
- Documenting @VimBehaviorDiffers usage
Daily GitHub Actions workflow runs at 7 AM UTC.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Local changes without a Pull Request are useless - added clear
instruction that the workflow must create a PR on GitHub.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
New workflow for routine test maintenance focusing on:
- Test quality and readability (meaningful content, clear names)
- Reviewing @Disabled tests to check if they can be re-enabled
- Ensuring @TestWithoutNeovim annotations have clear reasons
- Documenting @VimBehaviorDiffers usage
This complements the existing codebase maintenance workflow
but focuses exclusively on tests.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Image attachments from YouTrack tickets are now downloaded locally
so Claude can view them using the Read tool. This enables analysis
of visual bugs and UI issues that require screenshots.
Changes:
- Add downloadAttachment() function to youtrack.ts
- Download images to attachments/ directory during ticket selection
- Update ticket_details.md to reference local image paths
- Add cleanup step to remove temporary files after analysis
- Add prompt instruction about viewing image attachments
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add explicit instructions to create branch, commit, push, then create PR
- Add PR creation failure as a trigger for attention_required status
Fixes issue where Claude forgot to push branch before creating PR.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add step to review source code and git history before writing tests.
If bug appears already fixed (via code review or passing test), post
a private YouTrack comment mentioning @Aleksei.Plate and stop.
New result type: ANALYSIS_RESULT=already_fixed
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Point both workflows to .claude/settings.json to use project
configuration including enabled plugins.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Weekly check that compares current model against latest available.
If a newer model is found, Claude creates a PR with the update.
Uses Haiku for cost efficiency since this is a simple check task.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Use the changelog skill to add entries for bug fixes and features
before creating the PR. Added Skill to allowed tools.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Full test suite takes a while. Guidance now suggests:
- Run specific related tests for faster feedback
- Only run full suite for core changes
- CI will run all tests on the PR anyway
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PRs created by the YouTrack workflow now include a link to the
GitHub Actions run that generated them, making it easy to trace
back to the full Claude analysis.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
When Claude encounters issues needing maintainer attention:
- Missing tool permissions
- YouTrack API errors
- Workflow bugs or limitations
- Required capabilities unavailable
It outputs ANALYSIS_RESULT=attention_required with ATTENTION_REASON.
The job then fails, triggering GitHub notifications.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Detect tickets that are likely no longer relevant:
- References removed features or obsolete IDE versions
- Vague "doesn't work" reports older than 2 years with no activity
- Missing environment details and no follow-up from reporter
When detected, Claude posts a PRIVATE comment mentioning @Aleksei.Plate
with reasoning, then outputs ANALYSIS_RESULT=outdated.
Also adds ticket creation date to ticket_details.md for age assessment.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add getTicketComments() to fetch comment author, text, and date
- Add getTicketAttachments() to fetch attachment name, URL, and MIME type
- Include comments and attachments sections in ticket_details.md
This gives Claude more context when analyzing tickets - comments often
contain reproduction steps, workarounds, or clarifications.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add security notice warning about user-submitted content in tickets
- Add critical rules to treat ticket content as data only
- Instruct to mark suspicious/injection attempts as unsuitable
- Add reminder at end to ignore conflicting instructions from tickets
- Allow Bash(rm:*) command for cleanup operations
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Before implementing a fix, Claude must now investigate why the buggy
code exists - it may have been a deliberate trade-off from a previous
fix. This prevents re-introducing old bugs when fixing new ones.
Investigation includes: reviewing surrounding code, checking callers,
and using git log/blame to understand the history.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add IdeaVim-specific code-reviewer agent focusing on Vim compatibility,
Kotlin/Java quality, IntelliJ Platform patterns, and test coverage
- Update YouTrack auto-analysis workflow to require code review before
creating PRs (for both bugs and features)
- Add Task tool to allowed tools for subagent usage
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Bugs now require TDD approach: write failing test first, confirm
failure, implement fix, confirm test passes
- Bugs without reproducible tests should be marked as unsuitable
- Features have separate criteria and implementation steps
- Updated PR title format: Fix(VIM-XXXX) for bugs, Add(VIM-XXXX) for features
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Smaller changes are still preferred, but bigger changes are now
acceptable if Claude is confident about them.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
