Why is the old interface bad?
- it is not obvious. You cannot create a new panel or check if it is already created. Only "getOrCreate" it
- output panel is bound to editor while in Vim it is global
- we have the `isActive` field and the `clear()` method at the same time, because interface implies that you store the same instance of the panel and reactivate it for each output and I don't like it. We also can forget to call `clear()` after reusing panel
- we cannot "build" output before showing to make the panel more efficient. With multiple carets we can only cal `output(oldText + newText)` for each caret, and it is bad. (imagine we have global command with a lot of matches and for each time we will need to call the `output(oldText + newText)`)
- the `output()` method shows panel, activates it and updates it
- there are more things that I do not like, but the points above should be already enough
This bug was caused by two reasons:
1. KeyHandler state is not longer per-editor and we can't reset it on editor creation
2. We do not need to do such things on editor creation. What actually matters is focusing the editor
IJ has it's own kotlin libs, as well as fleet. So, let's use kotlin reflection library only to compile the project without bundling these jars into the resulting plugin
.name will show the correct name "IdeaVim" in IJ
`misc.xml` contains information about the annotations that should be considered as "EntryPoints" for the function. With this, they'll not be marked as unused
Explicit API mode has been removed due to several reasons impacting developer productivity and the natural coding style in Kotlin.
Firstly, the mode was found to be more irritating than beneficial, as it forced unnecessary verbosity without enhancing thoughtfulness in coding. It often prompted automatic 'public' insertion reactions to red-highlighted code, which did not genuinely encourage more deliberate coding decisions.
Secondly, our aim is to form a robust API primarily through interfaces, which inherently define public scope and duty, rendering explicit API mode somewhat redundant.
Lastly, the additional verbosity caused by explicit API mode expanded code lines affecting code readability.
The compatibility with the existing plugins is verified via the compatibility checker, so no JetBrains plugins will be affected
IntelliJ has multiple soft wrap options. One for main editors, another for consoles and a third for previews. This can lead to inconsistencies if initialising a console based on a main editor when both have default values, versus the same scenario when the main editor has an explicit value. Furthermore, the run console's soft-wraps toggle button uses the global value, so can get out of sync if the local value is initialised to an explicit value. This change will only copy the soft wrap value over during initialisation for similar editors (main editor, preview, diff) and not for different editors (console).
Fixes VIM-3450
